Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

Pea v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 22, 1964 · Black, Clark, Denno, Harlan, Opinions, Stated, Stewart, Supra, Their

378 U.S. 571 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Henry Lincoln Johnson, Jr. for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome Nelson for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Pea v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1964)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.