Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

Harris v. Texas

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 22, 1964 · Black, Clark, Denno, Harlan, Opinions, Stated, Stewart, Supra, Their

378 U.S. 572 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Marian S. Rosen for petitioner., Carl E. F. Dally for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Harris v. Texas (Supreme Court of the United States 1964)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.