Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

McLeod v. Ohio

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 22, 1964 · Clark, Harlan, Massiah, Reasons, Supra, White

378 U.S. 582; 84 S. Ct. 1922; 12 L. Ed. 2d 1037; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 870 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

21 later published cases cite this decision.

United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Lee Allison v. State of New Jersey (3d Cir. 1969)
United States ex rel. Allison v. New Jersey (3d Cir. 1969)
State v. McLeod (Ohio 1964)
State v. Blizzard (Md. 1976)
People v. De Renzzio (N.Y. 1966)
United States v. Olsen (District Court, D. Utah 1993)
Blizzard v. State (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1976)
Commonwealth v. Johnson (Pa. 1973)
United States v. Flack (United States Court of Military Appeals 1970)
Fugate v. Gaffney (United States District Court, Nebraska 1970)
United States of America Ex Rel. Michael O'COnnOr v. The State of New Jersey and Howard Yeager (3d Cir. 1968)
Parker L. Hancock, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison v. Charles White (1st Cir. 1967)
State v. Aiken (Wash. 1967)
People v. Garcia (Ill. 1967)
State v. Evans (La. 1966)
The PEOPLE v. Halstrom (Ill. 1966)
State v. Moscone (Conn. 1976)
State v. Darwin (Connecticut Superior Court 1972)
State v. Darwin (Conn. 1971)
State v. Laskey (Ohio 1970)
The PEOPLE v. Stark (Ill. 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Ohio for consideration in light of Massiah v. United States, 377 U. S. 201.

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons assigned in the dissenting opinion in Massiah v. United States, supra, at 207.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.