Supreme Court of the United States, 1965

Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 18, 1965 · Per Curiam

382 U.S. 32; 86 S. Ct. 152; 15 L. Ed. 2d 26; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 449 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Walter J. Blenko, Walter J. Blenko, Jr., and Richard F. Stevens for petitioner.', Robert J. Fay for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

Easter Seal Society for Disabled Children v. Berry (D.C. 1993)
Bertell v. Rockford Memorial Hospital (Ill. App. Ct. 2009)
Charles D. Scanio v. United States (2d Cir. 1994)
In RE McVAY (United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois 2011)
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. McVay (In re McVay) (United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois 2011)
Ming Hua Li v. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services (2d Cir. 2007)
Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. v. Amcell F Atlantic City, Inc. (D.C. Cir. 1994)
Telephone & Data Systems, Inc. v. Amcell F Atlantic City, Inc. (D.C. Cir. 1994)
Violet M. Maahs, and Alfred J. Maahs, Her Husband v. United States (11th Cir. 1988)
Hector Emilio Reyes-Cardona v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc. (1st Cir. 1982)
Baker v. Durkee Foods (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1982)
Kirby v. United States (District Court, D. South Carolina 1979)
Freeman v. Giacomo Costa Fu Andrea (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1968)
Gridiron Steel Company, Claintiff-Appellant v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, Gridiron Steel Company v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation (6th Cir. 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is granted, and the judgment dismissing petitioner’s appeal to that court is reversed. The time limited by 28 U. S. C. § 2107 and Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 73 for the filing of the notice of appeal from the judgment appealed from was 30 days. However, Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 6 (a), as amended, provides that in computing the period, “[t]he last day of the period so computed shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, a Sunday, or a legal holiday.” Since the thirtieth day following entry of the judgment appealed from was Saturday and the notice of appeal was filed the following Monday, we hold that the filing of the notice of appeal was timely. The provision of Rule 6 (a) was not *33 made inapplicable by the order of the Court of Appeals directing that the District Court Clerk’s offices be open for business on Saturday mornings. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.