Supreme Court of the United States, 1965

Maryland Ex Rel. Levin v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 6, 1965 · Clark, Harlan, Court'S, Fortas

382 U.S. 159; 86 S. Ct. 305; 15 L. Ed. 2d 227; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 209 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Theodore E. Wolcott for petitioners., Solicitor General Marshall, former Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander, Nathan Lewin and David L. Bose for the United States., Louis G. Davidson, Richard W. Galiher, William E. Stewart, Jr., and Peter J. McBreen, as amici curiae, urging reversal.

Cases that cite this one

39 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

Kise v. Department of Military & Veterans Affairs (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2001)
Dukakis v. United States Department of Defense (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1988)
Maryland Ex Rel. Gliedman v. Capital Airlines, Inc. (District Court, D. Maryland 1967)
Frank Giordano v. Andrews Hohns (3d Cir. 2025)
Stanford v. United States (District Court, E.D. Kentucky 2014)
Jones v. Crittenden (Ky. 2002)
State, Department of Military & Veterans Affairs v. Bowen (Alaska 1998)
Walker v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 1998)
Holmes v. California Army National Guard (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1996)
Yeary v. United States (District Court, S.D. Indiana 1996)
Mendrala v. Crown Mortgage Company (7th Cir. 1992)
Aube v. United States (Court of Claims 1992)
Mendrala v. Crown Mortgage Co. (7th Cir. 1992)
Matlack, Inc. v. Treadway (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 1990)
Rudy Perpich v. United States Department Of Defense (8th Cir. 1989)
Perpich v. United States Department of Defense (8th Cir. 1989)
Michael G. Holdiness v. A.M. Stroud, Jr. (5th Cir. 1987)
New York Council, Association Of Civilian Technicians, Petitioner, v. Federal Labor Relations Authority (2d Cir. 1985)
New York Council, Ass'n of Civilian Technicians v. Federal Labor Relations Authority (2d Cir. 1985)
Holdiness v. Louisiana (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 1983)
Engblom v. Carey (District Court, S.D. New York 1981)
Rowe v. State of Tenn. (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1977)
Hoersch v. Froehlke (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1974)
Feit v. Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corporation (District Court, E.D. New York 1971)
Calhoun v. Doster (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for rehearing and the motion to remand for trial on unresolved issues are granted as herein indicated. The judgment of this Court of May 3, 1965, 381 U. S. 41, is vacated, and in lieu thereof the following judgment is entered; “The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is modified to direct that the case be remanded to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for further proceedings with respect to the unresolved issues tendered in petitioners’ bill of complaint, and is in all other respects affirmed.”

R ü SQ Qrdered

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan, believing that a remand is legally unjustified, dissent from that part of the Court’s order. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.