C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1, 2, and 3 presented by the petition, which read as follows:

“1. Whether the indictment states the offense of conspiracy to defraud the United States;

“2. Whether, in the comparative light of American Communications Assn. v. Douds, 339 U. S. 382, and United States v. Archie Browm, 381 U. S. 437, Section 9 (h) of the Taft-Hartley Act is constitutional;

“3. Whether the trial court erred in denying petitioners’ motions for the production, to the'defense or the Court, of grand jury testimony of prosecution witnesses.”