Aluminum Co. of America v. United States
Aluminum Co. of America v. United States
382 U.S. 12; 86 S. Ct. 24; 15 L. Ed. 2d 1; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2416; 1965 Trade Cas. (CCH) 71,567
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Battle v. Liberty National Life Insurance (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 1987)
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Cafritz (District Court, District of Columbia 1991)
- United States v. Country Lake Foods, Inc. (D. Minn. 1990)
- Charles F. Booth, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. North American Aluminum Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Appellee (6th Cir. 1970)
- United States v. Ford Motor Company (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1970)
- Central Presbyterian Church v. Black Liberation Front (District Court, E.D. Missouri 1969)
- Gannon v. Action (District Court, E.D. Missouri 1969)
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Martin Frank, and Nylo-Thane Plastics Corp., Maurice Minuto, Olanda Minuto, Louis Braunston, Leonard Freedman (2d Cir. 1968)
- United States v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co. (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1968)
- United States v. Blue Chip Stamp Company (United States District Court for the Central District of California 1967)
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of America (District Court, E.D. Missouri 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES.
Supreme Court of United States.
Herbert A. Bergson, Howard Adler, Jr., Daniel H. Margolis and William K. Unverzagt for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Wright, Lionel Kestenbaum, Jerry Z. Pruzansky and Edna Lingreen for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.