Supreme Court of the United States, 1965

McKinley v. Reilly

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 17, 1965 · Per Curiam

381 U.S. 276; 85 S. Ct. 1457; 14 L. Ed. 2d 431; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 1216 (United States Reports)

Opinion

381 U.S. 276 (1965)

McKINLEY
v.
REILLY ET AL.

No. 1000.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 17, 1965.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.

Mark Wilmer for appellant.

Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, Phillip M. Haggerty and Jerry W. Lawson, Assistant Attorneys General, and John E. Madden, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

McKinley v. Reilly

Opinion

McKINLEYv.REILLY ET AL.

PER CURIAM.

McKINLEY
v.
REILLY ET AL.