Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

Solomon v. South Carolina

Solomon v. South Carolina
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 17, 1966 · Douglas, Brennan, Stewart
382 U.S. 204; 86 S. Ct. 396; 15 L. Ed. 2d 270; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 129 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Ellis Lyons for appellant., Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and E. N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Solomon v. South Carolina

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

382 U.S. 204 (1965)

SOLOMON
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA.

No. 588.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 6, 1965.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.

Ellis Lyons for appellant.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and E. N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed on the authority of Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U. S. 398. And see McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U. S. 420, 561, 577 (dissenting opinion).

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.