Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

Albanese v. N. v. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 17, 1966 · Harlan

382 U.S. 283; 86 S. Ct. 429; 15 L. Ed. 2d 327; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Philip F. DiCostanzo and Robert Klonsky for petitioner in No. 523. Sidney A. Schwartz and Joseph Arthur Cohen for petitioner in No. 557., Edmund F. Lamb for respondent N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats. in Nos. 523 and 557 and for petitioner in No. 654., Arthur J. Mandell for the American Trial Lawyers Association Admiralty Section, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition in No. 523.

Cases that cite this one

36 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

Anthony Albanese v. N v. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats, and Third-Party v. International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent (2d Cir. 1968)
Pinto v. VESSEL" SANTA ISABEL" (District Court, Canal Zone 1980)
Albanese v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats. (District Court, S.D. New York 1967)
Robert Price v. Ss Yaracuy (5th Cir. 1967)
Fairmont Shipping Corp. And Fairwinds Ocean Carriers Corp., Owners of the Steamship Western Eagle v. Chevron International Oil Company, Inc. (2d Cir. 1975)
Croshaw v. Koninklijke Nedlloyd, B. v. Rijswijk (District Court, D. Oregon 1975)
Tallmon v. Toko Kaium K.K. Kobe (District Court, D. Oregon 1967)
In re the Complaint of Berkley Curtis Bay Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1983)
Burks v. American River Transportation Co. (5th Cir. 1982)
Frank Bernardini v. And International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., Third-Party (2d Cir. 1975)
De Thomas v. Delta S.S. Lines, Inc. (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 1973)
Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los Santos (Supreme Court of the United States 1981)
Milos v. Sea-Land Service, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1979)
Joseph Rodriguez v. Olaf Pedersen's Rederi A/s, and Third-Party v. American Stevedores, Inc., Third-Party and A. M. Kristopher Co., Inc., Third-Party (2d Cir. 1976)
Fernandez v. Chios Shipping Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1976)
Harry Henry and Robert E. Braye, Jr. v. A/s Ocean and John P. Pederson & Sons, and Third-Party & v. Pittston Stevedoring Corporation, Third-Party (2d Cir. 1975)
Frasca v. Prudential-Grace Lines, Inc. (District Court, D. Maryland 1975)
Lucas v. " BRINKNES" SCHIFFAHRTS GES. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1974)
Rodriguez v. Olaf Pedersen's Rederi A/S (District Court, E.D. New York 1974)
Fedison v. Vessel Wislica (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1974)
Michael T. Earles v. Union Barge Line Corporation, Billy Leroy McNamer v. Union Barge Line Corporation (3d Cir. 1973)
Nos. 19395-19397 (3d Cir. 1971)
Jones v. Den Norske Amerikalinje A/S (3d Cir. 1971)
Gebhard v. S.S. Hawaiian Legislator (9th Cir. 1970)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

382 U.S. 283 (1965)

ALBANESE
v.
N. V. NEDERL. AMERIK STOOMV. MAATS. ET AL.

No. 523.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 13, 1965.^[*]ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Philip F. DiCostanzo and Robert Klonsky for petitioner in No. 523. Sidney A. Schwartz and Joseph Arthur Cohen for petitioner in No. 557.

Edmund F. Lamb for respondent N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats. in Nos. 523 and 557 and for petitioner in No. 654.

Arthur J. Mandell for the American Trial Lawyers Association Admiralty Section, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition in No. 523.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the American Trial Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. The petition for certiorari in No. 523, Albanese v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats., is also granted.

We believe that the judgment of the Court of Appeals setting aside the judgment for petitioner Albanese on the ground that the trial court incorrectly charged the jury on the issue of negligence is erroneous. Gutierrez v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 373 U. S. 206.

*284 In its opinion the Court of Appeals also stated that the District Court incorrectly instructed the jury as to the applicability of the Safety and Health Regulations for Longshoring^[] on the question of the shipowner's liability. But we do not read that court's opinion as making this an independent ground for ordering a new trial. So we not only reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals in the case of Albanese but reinstate the District Court's judgment in his favor.

The petitions in No. 557, International Terminal Operating Co. v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats.; and No. 654, N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats. v. Albanese, are denied.

It is so ordered.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would have denied certiorari in No. 523, Albanese v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats., but the writ having been granted, he would have set the issues for plenary consideration. He concurs in the denial of certiorari in No. 557, International Terminal Operating Co. v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats., and No. 654, N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats. v. Albanese.

NOTES

[*] Together with No. 557, International Terminal Operating Co., Inc. v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats.; and No. 654, N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Maats. v. Albanese et al., also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the same court.

[] 29 CFR § 9.1 et seq. (1963), now 29 CFR § 1504.1 (1965), promulgated by the Secretary of Labor under the authority of Public Law 85-742, 72 Stat. 835, 33 U. S. C. § 941 (1964 ed.).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.