Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

Hollingshead v. Wainwright

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 18, 1966 · Harlan, Stewart

384 U.S. 31; 86 S. Ct. 1284; 16 L. Ed. 2d 333; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1823 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se., Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Herzig v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
Meyer v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Cleveland Hollingshead v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida (5th Cir. 1970)
State v. Herzig (Fla. 1968)
Hollingshead v. Wainwright (Fla. 1967)
Hollingshead v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
Bashlor v. Wainwright (Fla. 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.