Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

Pope v. Daggett

Pope v. Daggett
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 20, 1966 · Per Curiam
384 U.S. 33 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Doar and David L. Norman for respondents.

Pope v. Daggett

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the representations of the Solicitor General that the relief petitioner seeks is presently available due to changes in the applicable prison regulations and upon an examination of all of the papers submitted, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas with instructions to dismiss as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.