Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

Castaldi v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 10, 1966 · Black, Schnackenberg

384 U.S. 886; 86 S. Ct. 1906; 16 L. Ed. 2d 993; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1137 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Daniel H. Greenberg for petitioner in No. 33. Philip R. Edelbaum for petitioner in No. 218., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States in No. 33. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States in No. 218.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Walter Martin, Jr. v. United States (8th Cir. 1975)
Sherrie Bursey and Brenda Joyce Presley v. United States (9th Cir. 1972)
United States v. Warren (D.C. 1977)
In re Carol Vericker (2d Cir. 1971)
United States v. Mandujano (Supreme Court of the United States 1976)
United States v. Munoz Franco (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 2000)
United States v. Harold Kaufman (7th Cir. 1968)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for further proceedings in the light of Shillitani v. United States, ante, p. 364.

Mr. Justice Black concurs in the result. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in Cheff v. Schnackenberg, ante, at 380.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.