Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 20, 1966 · Per Curiam

384 U.S. 888; 86 S. Ct. 1912; 16 L. Ed. 2d 994; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1139 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States et al., Douglas F. Smith, Howard J. Trienens, George L. Saunders, Jr., John E. McCullough, S. R. Brittingham, Jr., Charles W. Burkett, Monroe E. Clinton, Frank S. Farrell, Alan C. Furth, Lawrence W. Hobbs, Thormund A. Miller, Robert L. Pierce, E. P. Porter, L. E. Torinus, Jr., and E. L. Van Dellen for appellees, Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the memorandum of certain appellees and an examination of the entire record, so much of the judgment of the District Court as respects the portions of the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission dated March 21, 1963, and December 31, 1963, as were vacated by orders of the Commission of January 7, 1966, and March 17, 1966, and two orders of April 13, 1966, is vacated and to that extent the cause is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss such portions of the judgment as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.