Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

Worthy v. United States

Worthy v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 20, 1966 · Per Curiam
384 U.S. 894; 86 S. Ct. 1961 (United States Reports)

Counsel

David B. Isbell for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.

Worthy v. United States

Cases that cite this one

31 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 855.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.