Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

Whisman v. Georgia

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 20, 1966 · Douglas

384 U.S. 895; 86 S. Ct. 1977; 16 L. Ed. 2d 1001; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1146 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Reuben A. Garland and Beryl H. Weiner for appellant., Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, and Alfred L. Evans, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Johnson (Supreme Court of the United States 1982)
Green v. State (Ga. 1980)
Daniel v. Louisiana (Supreme Court of the United States 1975)
State v. Scofield (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968)
State v. Blodgette (Ariz. 1979)
Whisman v. State (Ga. 1967)
Owings v. United States Court of Military Appeals (Supreme Court of the United States 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed. He would remand the case for a new trial, it being clear from the record that the principles announced in Miranda v. Arizona, ante, p. 436, were not applied. He sees no reason for discriminating against this petitioner, the case having come here on direct review and being of the same vintage as Miranda v. Arizona. See dissenting opinion in Johnson v. New Jersey, ante, at 736.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.