Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

Kramer v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 25, 1966 · Per Curiam

384 U.S. 100; 86 S. Ct. 1366; 16 L. Ed. 2d 396; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1762; 62 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2045 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Anna R. Lavin and Frank J. McGarr for petitioners., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

20 later published cases cite this decision. The 19 that cite it most often are listed here.

United States v. Oscar E. Hyde (5th Cir. 1971)
United States v. George Demet (7th Cir. 1973)
United States v. Joseph Amabile (7th Cir. 1968)
Chicago District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Strom (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1986)
United States v. Wilford (8th Cir. 1983)
United States v. Marvin Mattson and Edward F. Greene (7th Cir. 1982)
Doepel v. United States (D.C. 1981)
United States v. John Arambasich (7th Cir. 1979)
United States v. Stone (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 1978)
United States v. Michael Joseph Orzechowski (7th Cir. 1977)
United States v. Philip Rastelli (2d Cir. 1977)
United States v. Arthur Brecht (2d Cir. 1976)
United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, United States of America v. Mike Grancich (9th Cir. 1975)
United States v. L. Joseph Overton (2d Cir. 1973)
United States v. Johnson (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1969)
Musicians Union, Local No. 6 v. Superior Court (Cal. 1968)
United States v. Schipani (District Court, E.D. New York 1968)
United States v. Rocco Pranno and Wayne Seidler (7th Cir. 1967)
People v. Samuel (Cal. Ct. App. 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the representations of the Solicitor General and upon an independent examination of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order suspending the imposition of sentence for the conviction on count two of the indictment as to Roy E. Kramer is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for entry of an appropriate sentence. In all other respects the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.