Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

United States v. Ohio

United States v. Ohio
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 10, 1966 · Per Curiam
385 U.S. 9 (United States Reports)
United States v. Ohio

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

385 U.S. 9 (1966)

UNITED STATES
v.
OHIO.

No. 271.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 10, 1966.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Gerald A. Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U. S. 111.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.