Drum v. Seawell
Drum v. Seawell
383 U.S. 831; 86 S. Ct. 1237; 16 L. Ed. 2d 298; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1911
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- Stephenson v. Bartlett (N.C. 2002)
- Preisler v. Secretary of State of Missouri (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1966)
- Wells v. Rockefeller (District Court, S.D. New York 1967)
- Preisler v. Secretary of State of Missouri (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1968)
- Kilgarlin v. Hill (Supreme Court of the United States 1967)
- Baker v. Bindner (District Court, W.D. Kentucky 1967)
- Jones v. Falcey (N.J. 1966)
- NC NAACP v. Moore (N.C. 2022)
- N.C. State Conf. of NAACP v. Moore (N.C. 2022)
- Matter of Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4 (N.C. 1978)
- In re the Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4 (N.C. 1978)
- Moss v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 1976)
- Connor v. Williams (Supreme Court of the United States 1972)
- Hartman v. City and County of Denver (Colo. 1968)
- Maryland Citizens Committee for Fair Congressional Redistricting, Inc. v. Tawes (District Court, D. Maryland 1966)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
DRUM ET AL.
v.
SEAWELL, CHAIRMAN OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Louis Rabil and Robinson O. Everett for appellants.
T. Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General, and Thomas L. Young for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to advance and expedite consideration is granted. The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.