Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

Long v. District Court of Iowa ex rel. Lee County

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 28, 1966

383 U.S. 925; 86 S. Ct. 934; 15 L. Ed. 2d 844; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2171 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se. Lawrence F. Scalise, Attorney General of Iowa, and Don R. Bennett, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision. The 16 that cite it most often are listed here.

United States Ex Rel. Rush v. York (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 1967)
State v. Johnson (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1996)
United States v. Lewis F. Shelton, James Darrough, John Derry, Donald Burks, and Carl Bledsoe (7th Cir. 1982)
United States v. Alvin Charles Sue (8th Cir. 1978)
United States v. DePalma (District Court, S.D. New York 1978)
United States v. Coyne (District Court, W.D. New York 1977)
United States v. John McClean (2d Cir. 1976)
United States v. Charles Goldberg and Pocono International Corporation (2d Cir. 1975)
United States v. Robert S. Sciolino (2d Cir. 1974)
United States v. Seiffert (District Court, S.D. Texas 1973)
United States v. Ralph 'Whitey' Tropiano, Lawrence R. Pellegrino and William Grasso,defendants-Appellants (2d Cir. 1969)
United States v. Anthony Baratta, Samuel Monastersky, and Rocco Sancinella (2d Cir. 1968)
The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (Supreme Court of the United States 1967)
Control Data Corp. v. Carolina Power & Light Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1967)
Air Transport Association of America v. Hernandez (District Court, District of Columbia 1967)
J. M. Huber Corporation v. William Harvey Denman and Jay Pumphrey, Trustees of the Estate of S. B. Burnett, Deceased (5th Cir. 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Sup. Ct. Iowa. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari is also granted limited to the following question:

“Did the refusal of the state trial court to provide a transcript for the petitioner, solely because state law made no provision for furnishing of a transcript without the payment of a fee, deny the petitioner the opportunity to obtain full appellate review of the trial court’s denial of the petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and thereby deprive the petitioner of the equal protection of the laws?”

Casé transferred to appellate docket.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.