Supreme Court of the United States, 1966

Gent v. Arkansas

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 16, 1966 · Black, Douglas, Jurisdiction, Limitation, Would

384 U.S. 937; 86 S. Ct. 1454 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Emanuel Redfield for appellants.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Stroud v. State (Ind. 1971)
Commonwealth v. Dell Publications, Inc. (Pa. 1967)
Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation (Supreme Court of the United States 1979)
Redrup v. New York (Supreme Court of the United States 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ark. Probable jurisdiction noted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the jurisdictional statement which read as follows:

“1. Is Act 261 of The Arkansas Acts of 1961 invalid in that on its face and as applied it impairs the freedom of expression protected by the First, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, in that it operates as a forbidden prior restraint on expression?

“2. Is Act 261 of The Arkansas Acts of 1961 invalid in that on its face and as applied it impairs the freedom of expression protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, in that it is vague and uncertain?”

As to the other questions presented, which are non-appealable, treating the papers as a petition for a writ of *938certiorari, certiorari is denied. Mishkin v. New York, 383 U. S. 502, at 512-514.

Emanuel Redfield for appellants. Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Stewart would note probable jurisdiction without limitation.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.