Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Zuckerman v. Greason

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 13, 1967 · Clark, Harlan, Stewart, Klein, Jersey

386 U.S. 15; 87 S. Ct. 847; 17 L. Ed. 2d 696; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2273 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Leonard Feldman for petitioners., Samuel Greason, respondent, pro se.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Landon Zuckerman and Sam Haber v. Appellate Division, Second Department, Supreme Court of the State of New York (2d Cir. 1970)
Silbert v. United States (District Court, D. Maryland 1968)
In re Zuckerman (N.Y. 1967)
State v. Eddington (Utah Ct. App. 2023)
In re Zuckerman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511.

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Harlan’s dissenting opinion in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520. Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.