Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Comm. on Discipline of Assn. of Bar of City of New York
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Jewell v. Hepp (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 2022)
- Glen Harris v. JohnMichael O'Hare (2d Cir. 2014)
- Glen Harris v. JohnMichael O'Hare (2d Cir. 2014)
- Glen Harris v. JohnMichael O'Hare (2d Cir. 2014)
- Silbert v. United States (District Court, D. Maryland 1968)
- Ingram v. McMahill (District Court, D. Nevada 2024)
- Simmons v. Koh (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2021)
- State v. Wells (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
- People v. Douglas (Ill. App. Ct. 1971)
- In re Kaye (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
KAYE
v.
CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
Supreme Court of United States.
Morton Liftin for petitioner.
Angelo T. Cometa for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520, and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U. S. 493, 500.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.