Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Comm. on Discipline of Assn. of Bar of City of New York

Supreme Court of the United States February 13, 1967

Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Comm. on Discipline of Assn. of Bar of City of New York, 386 U.S. 17 (1967)

87 S. Ct. 848; 17 L. Ed. 2d 698; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2275

White, Clark, Harlan, Stewart, Klein, Jersey

Dissenting Opinion

Mr. Justice White

dissents for the. reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511.

Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of Mr. Justice Harlan in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520, and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U. S. 493, 500.

Reference

Full Case Name: Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Committee on Discipline of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York
Cited By: 11 cases
Status: Published