Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Phillips v. California

Phillips v. California
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 10, 1967 · Black, Clark, California
386 U.S. 212; 87 S. Ct. 977; 17 L. Ed. 2d 870; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2146 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Appellants pro se., Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Clark Moore, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Phillips v. California

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The •judgment is reversed. Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Black and'Mr. Justice Clark are of the opinion that the judgment should be vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, supra. Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm the judgment below for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Chapman v. California, supra, at 45.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.