Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Cotter v. California

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 13, 1967 · Stewart

386 U.S. 274; 87 S. Ct. 1035; 18 L. Ed. 2d 43; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2049 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se., Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, .William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Gordon Ringer, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

23 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Hines (Cal. 1967)
People v. Turner (Cal. 1984)
People v. Terry (Cal. 1970)
People v. Morse (Cal. 1969)
People v. Quicke (Cal. 1969)
People v. Fioritto (Cal. 1968)
People v. Johnson (Cal. 1968)
People v. Charles (Cal. 1967)
People v. Charles (Cal. 1967)
People v. Asay (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)
State v. Turrentine (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986)
People v. Hinds (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)
In re Morse (Cal. 1969)
People v. Morris (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)
People v. Sirhan (Cal. 1972)
People v. Woodberry (Cal. Ct. App. 1968)
People v. Valencia (Cal. Ct. App. 1968)
In re Cameron (Cal. 1968)
People v. Powell (Cal. 1967)
People v. Wenke CA1/1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)
People v. Ramirez (Cal. Ct. App. 1974)
People v. Hudgins (Cal. Ct. App. 1967)
Darnell v. State Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City (Okla. 1916)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for .a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.