Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Boyden v. California

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 13, 1967 · Stewart, California

386 U.S. 278; 87 S. Ct. 1037; 18 L. Ed. 2d 46; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2053 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Appellant pro se., Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and. Jack K. Weber, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Randol (Kan. 1979)
State v. Meinert (Kan. 1979)
State v. Hill (Kan. 1962)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would vacaté the judgment and remand for reconsideration in light of the views stated in his opinion concurring-dn the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.