Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Blankenship v. Holding

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 15, 1967 · No. 1089 · Per Curiam

387 U.S. 95; 18 L. Ed. 2d 586; 87 S. Ct. 1419; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1488 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Jeff Hartmann, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants., Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan for appellee.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Probable jurisdiction noted. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is affirmed insofar as it adjudged provisions of §§ 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be unconstitutional.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.