Schackman v. Arnebergh

Supreme Court of the United States
Schackman v. Arnebergh, 387 U.S. 427 (1967)
18 L. Ed. 2d 865; 87 S. Ct. 1622; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1332
Per Curiam

Schackman v. Arnebergh

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U. S. C. §§ 2281-2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U. S. 713, and not in this Court. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 385 U. S. 3.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Reference

Full Case Name
SCHACKMAN Et Al. v. ARNEBERGH, CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Et Al.
Cited By
76 cases
Status
Published