Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Camodeo v. United States

Camodeo v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 5, 1967 · Harlan, Stewart, White
387 U.S. 575; 87 S. Ct. 2070; 18 L. Ed. 2d 966; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1261 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.

Camodeo v. United States

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.