Parks v. Simpson Timber Co.
Parks v. Simpson Timber Co.
388 U.S. 459; 87 S. Ct. 2115; 18 L. Ed. 2d 1319; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1110
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision. The 17 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Lambert v. PBI INDUSTRIES (Pa. Super. Ct. 1976)
- Hall v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 1972)
- Bendorf v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengeselischaft (N.M. Ct. App. 1975)
- Jose Manuel Quijada Gaxiola v. United States (9th Cir. 1970)
- Simpson Timber Co. And Grace Line, Inc. v. Ezra Parks, Simpson Timber Co. v. Grace Line, Inc. (9th Cir. 1968)
- Ruben Martinez v. Pacific Industrial Service Corporation Weatherford U.S., Inc. (9th Cir. 1990)
- Margaret Austin, Etc. v. Unarco Industries, Inc. (1st Cir. 1983)
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. American President Lines, Ltd. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1971)
- Watz v. Zapata Off-Shore Co. (5th Cir. 1970)
- Penn Tanker Company v. United States of America, United States of America v. Penn Tanker Company (5th Cir. 1969)
- Schaeffer v. Michigan-Ohio Navigation Company (6th Cir. 1969)
- Schaeffer v. Michigan-Ohio Navigation Co. (6th Cir. 1969)
- Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (8th Cir. 1968)
- Rideaux v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Company (District Court, S.D. Texas 1968)
- United States v. B & H DIST. CORP. (District Court, W.D. Wisconsin 1974)
- Canton Poultry, Inc. v. Conner (United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida 1968)
- Parks v. Simpson Timber Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. Albanese v. N. V. Nederl. Amerik Stoomv. Moats., 382 U. S. 283. The case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in order that that court may pass upon the issues in this case not covered by its prior opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.