Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Hemphill v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 12, 1967 · Per Curiam

388 U.S. 465; 87 S. Ct. 2128; 18 L. Ed. 2d 1323; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1118 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se., William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Burnett (Ill. 1970)
People v. Hemphill (Ill. App. Ct. 1968)
People v. Johnson (Ill. 1967)
State v. Valencia (Ariz. Ct. App. 1996)
State v. Anaya (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990)
Rattancraft of California v. United States (United States Customs Court 1972)
Gonzalo Carrasco-Favela v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (9th Cir. 1971)
State v. Andrews (Ariz. 1970)
Little v. Commonwealth (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) 1969)
Augustin Noverola-Bolaina v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (9th Cir. 1968)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Illinois with instructions to appoint counsel and hear the appeal. Milani v. Illinois, 386 U. S. 12.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.