Wood v. United States
Cases that cite this one
26 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Cassius Marsellus Clay, Jr. v. United States (5th Cir. 1968)
- United States v. Brooks (District Court, W.D. Louisiana 1969)
- United States v. Sidney Barcelon (10th Cir. 1987)
- People v. Alengi (Colo. App. 2005)
- Julita David Robertson v. United States (5th Cir. 1969)
- Potter v. State (Del. 1988)
- United States v. Robert J. Cohen (8th Cir. 1969)
- Gary Herndon McCoy v. United States (5th Cir. 1968)
- United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl Parker (2d Cir. 2006)
- United States v. Gray Moore, Jr. (5th Cir. 1982)
- Enrique v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
- United States v. James K. Deutsch (5th Cir. 1979)
- United States v. Clark Bracewell (2d Cir. 1978)
- United States v. Maurice Raymond Turcotte (5th Cir. 1973)
- United States v. John E. Kelly (7th Cir. 1972)
- Leo Anaya v. J. E. Baker, Warden (10th Cir. 1970)
- Bowen v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)
- United States v. Thorn (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1970)
- United States v. Kenneth Wood (5th Cir. 1969)
- Kenneth Wood v. United States (5th Cir. 1968)
- Nathan Tony Jones v. United States (5th Cir. 1968)
- Gregory Lee Merritt v. United States (5th Cir. 1968)
- Kincade v. State (Ark. 1990)
- United States v. Elmer Curtis Jones (6th Cir. 2023)
- Robinson v. Callahan (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2020)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Petitioner was found guilty by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia of refusing to report for civilian employment, in violation of § 12 of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 62 Stat. 622, 50 U. S. C. App. § 462. Before trial he filed an affidavit with the court requesting assigned counsel pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U. S. C. § 3006A. The court considered the affidavit, questioned petitioner and disapproved the request. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted leave to appeal in forma pauperis, assigned counsel to assist petitioner in his appeal and affirmed the conviction. Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari.
Before this Court the Solicitor General has conceded that the record does not convincingly show that there *21 was adequate inquiry into the question of petitioner’s financial ability to retain counsel, in that “the trial court should have explored the possibility that petitioner could afford only partial payment for the services of trial counsel and that counsel be appointed on that basis, as the Criminal Justice Act permits (see 18 U. S. C. § 3006(A) (c) and (f)).” The Solicitor General urges, however, that there is no basis for believing that petitioner suffered prejudice from the District Court’s error, an argument we find unpersuasive.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for reconsideration in light of the Solicitor General’s Memorandum and the relevant criteria of the Criminal Justice Act.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.