Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad
Cases that cite this one
46 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc. (District Court, D. South Carolina 1975)
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc. (District Court, D. South Carolina 1975)
- National Labor Relations Board v. Blevins Popcorn Company, American Federation of Grain Millers, Intervenor (D.C. Cir. 1981)
- Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of America (3d Cir. 1976)
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency (D.C. Cir. 1975)
- Kammerman v. Kammerman (D.C. 1988)
- Virnetx Inc. v. Apple Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2019)
- Lindsey Ex Rel. Lindsey v. City of Beaufort (District Court, D. South Carolina 1995)
- LaShawn A. v. Kelly (District Court, District of Columbia 1995)
- Farkas v. Ellis (District Court, S.D. New York 1991)
- Mercer v. Mitchell (11th Cir. 1990)
- Mercer v. Mitchell (11th Cir. 1990)
- Carlos Morales-Feliciano v. Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (1st Cir. 1989)
- NAACP, Jefferson County Branch v. McLaughlin (District Court, District of Columbia 1989)
- United States v. Darwin Construction Co. (District Court, D. Maryland 1988)
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cincinnati Bronze, Inc. (6th Cir. 1987)
- NAACP, Jefferson County Branch v. Brock (District Court, District of Columbia 1985)
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ormont Drug & Chemical Company, Inc. (D.C. Cir. 1984)
- United States v. John Larry Ray (7th Cir. 1982)
- United States v. Jose L. Martinez (5th Cir. 1982)
- Taylor v. United States (D.C. 1982)
- Robert Anthony Reed III v. Cleveland Board of Education (6th Cir. 1979)
- United States v. Sinclair (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 1976)
- Wambles v. Coppage (Ala. Civ. App. 1976)
- Consolidation Coal Company v. Local Union No. 1784, United Mine Workers of America (6th Cir. 1975)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The order of December 4, 1967, denying the petition for a writ of certiorari is vacated.
This case is a consequence of a dispute with respect to the scope of an arbitration award governing the manning of trains and engines in freight service. The union took the position that the award had no effect after 12:01 a. m., March 31, 1966. On March 28, the District Court for the District of Columbia issued a temporary restraining order forbidding a strike. On March 31, the union struck against a number of railroads. The District Court *328 entered contempt orders, imposing substantial fines for alleged violation of its restraining order. The Court of Appeals ruled on various legal issues presented to it but remanded to the District Court to consider whether there had in fact been a contempt, and, also, if there was á contempt, whether it was “of such magnitude as to warrant retention, in part or to any extent, of the coercive fine originally provided for in contemplation of an outright refusal to obey.”
Petitioners seek certiorari to review the adverse rulings made by the Court of Appeals. However, because the Court of Appeals remanded the case, it is not yet ripe for review by this Court. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. See Hamilton Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers, 240 U. S. 251, 257-258 (1916).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.