Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Conner v. City of Hammond

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 23, 1967 · Harlan, Douglas

389 U.S. 48; 88 S. Ct. 234; 19 L. Ed. 2d 47; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 442 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Leonard B. Levy and Stanley Fleishman for petitioner.

Cases that cite this one

25 later published cases cite this decision.

Vernon Walker Huffman v. United States, Dennis Eugene Pryba v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1972)
United States v. William Groner, D/B/A Lucky Distributors (5th Cir. 1972)
People v. Bloss (Mich. 1972)
Grand Rapids City Attorney v. Bloss (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
People v. Billingsley (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
State v. Hoyt (Minn. 1970)
Commonwealth v. LaLONDE (Pa. 1972)
State v. Carlson (Minn. 1972)
In re Seven Magazines (R.I. 1970)
Hayse v. Van Hoomissen (District Court, D. Oregon 1970)
In re Seven Magazines (R.I. 1970)
United States v. Robert Baranov, United States of America v. Harvey B. Levitt, United States of America v. H. B. Levitt & Associates, Inc. (9th Cir. 1969)
Wayne County Prosecutor v. Doerfler (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton (Supreme Court of the United States 1973)
State v. Hoelscher (Minn. 1972)
People v. Kirkpatrick (Criminal Court of the City of New York 1970)
Ginsberg v. New York (Supreme Court of the United States 1968)
Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas (Supreme Court of the United States 1968)
Village Books, Inc. v. State's Attorney (Md. 1973)
United States v. New Orleans Book Mart, Inc. (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1971)
State v. Katz (Superior Court of Delaware 1971)
State Ex Rel. Sensenbrenner v. Adult Book Store (Ohio Ct. App. 1971)
People v. Carlos (N.Y. 1969)
People v. Stabile (Criminal Court of the City of New York 1969)
People v. Clark (Criminal Court of the City of New York 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Twenty-first Judicial District Court for the Parish of Tangipahoa, Louisiana, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.

Mr. Justice Harlan

would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455.

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.