Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Tettamble v. Missouri

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 13, 1967 · Per Curiam

386 U.S. 265; 18 L. Ed. 2d 42 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se., Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and Harold L. McFadden, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Morris (Mo. Ct. App. 1978)
State v. Madison (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)
State v. Tettamble (Mo. 1970)
State v. Tettamble (Mo. 1968)
Harold R. Swenson, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary v. William B. Donnell (8th Cir. 1967)
Sederquist v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (District Court, D. Nevada 1987)
State v. White (Mo. 1981)
State v. Sager (Mo. Ct. App. 1980)
State v. Pitchford (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)
State v. Tettamble (Mo. Ct. App. 1974)
Hudgins v. California (Supreme Court of the United States 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in jornia pauperis and the petition for- a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Missouri for further consideration in light of Swenson v. Bosler, ante, p. 258.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.