Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Schackman v. California

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 12, 1967 · Clark, Ginzburg, Roth, Massachusetts

388 U.S. 454; 87 S. Ct. 2107; 18 L. Ed. 2d 1316; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1105 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Burton Marks for appellants., Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

31 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

Hermann v. United States (D.C. 1969)
Vernon Walker Huffman v. United States, Dennis Eugene Pryba v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1972)
United States v. William Groner, D/B/A Lucky Distributors (5th Cir. 1972)
State v. Grauf (Or. Ct. App. 1972)
People v. Bloss (Mich. 1972)
Scuncio v. Columbus Theatre, Inc. (R.I. 1971)
Grand Rapids City Attorney v. Bloss (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
People v. Billingsley (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
State v. Smith (Mo. 1967)
State v. Hoyt (Minn. 1970)
Commonwealth v. LaLONDE (Pa. 1972)
Commonwealth v. Dell Publications, Inc. (Pa. 1967)
State v. Carlson (Minn. 1972)
United States v. New Orleans Book Mart, Inc. (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1971)
United States v. Pinkus (United States District Court for the Central District of California 1971)
In re Seven Magazines (R.I. 1970)
Hayse v. Van Hoomissen (District Court, D. Oregon 1970)
In re Seven Magazines (R.I. 1970)
United States v. Robert Baranov, United States of America v. Harvey B. Levitt, United States of America v. H. B. Levitt & Associates, Inc. (9th Cir. 1969)
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton (Supreme Court of the United States 1973)
People v. Adler (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California 1972)
State v. Hoelscher (Minn. 1972)
Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas (Supreme Court of the United States 1968)
Rea Express, Inc. v. Alabama Great Southern Railroad (District Court, S.D. New York 1976)
People v. Mature Enterprises, Inc. (Criminal Court of the City of New York 1973)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgments of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, are reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Clark, and Mr. Justice Brennan would affirm the judgments of the lower court. Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U. S. 463. Mr. Justice Harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.