Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Avansino v. New York

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 12, 1967 · York, Roth, Massachusetts

388 U.S. 446; 87 S. Ct. 2093; 18 L. Ed. 2d 1308; 1967 U.S. LEXIS 1096 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Eugene Gressman for petitioners., Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

28 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

Vernon Walker Huffman v. United States, Dennis Eugene Pryba v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1972)
People v. Bloss (Mich. 1972)
Grand Rapids City Attorney v. Bloss (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
People v. Billingsley (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
United States v. William Groner, D/B/A Lucky Distributors (5th Cir. 1972)
State v. Hoyt (Minn. 1970)
Commonwealth v. LaLONDE (Pa. 1972)
State v. Smith (Mo. 1967)
Commonwealth v. Dell Publications, Inc. (Pa. 1967)
State v. Carlson (Minn. 1972)
United States v. New Orleans Book Mart, Inc. (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1971)
In re Seven Magazines (R.I. 1970)
City of Chicago v. Geraci (Ill. 1970)
City of Chicago v. Geraci (Ill. 1970)
Luros v. United States (8th Cir. 1968)
Leon J. Grant and Walter F. Wissman v. United States (9th Cir. 1967)
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton (Supreme Court of the United States 1973)
State v. Hoelscher (Minn. 1972)
In re Seven Magazines (R.I. 1970)
Ginsberg v. New York (Supreme Court of the United States 1968)
Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas (Supreme Court of the United States 1968)
Poulos v. Rucker (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 1968)
Kaplan v. California (Supreme Court of the United States 1973)
Kaplan v. California (Supreme Court of the United States 1973)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark would affirm. Mishkin v. New York, 383 U. S. 602. Mr. Justice Harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.