Supreme Court of the United States, 1967

Boston & Providence Railroad Stockholders Development Group v. United States Court of Appeals

Boston & Providence Railroad Stockholders Development Group v. United States Court of Appeals
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 4, 1967 · No. 661
389 U.S. 967 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Armistead B. Rood on the motions., Briefs in opposition to the latter motion were filed by James Garfield, James Wm. Moore and Robert W. Blanchette for Smith et al., Trustees of the property of New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co.; Robert W. Meserve for Boston & Providence Railroad Corp. Stockholders Committee; Acting Solicitor General Spritzer for the United States; and by Charles Y. Wadsworth for Boston & Providence Railroad Corp.

Boston & Providence Railroad Stockholders Development Group v. United States Court of Appeals

Opinion of the Court

(See No. 624, infra, p. 974.) Motion to dispense with printing extra copies of Appendix C to petition granted. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.