McSurely v. Ratliff
McSurely v. Ratliff
390 U.S. 412; 19 L. Ed. 2d 1272; 88 S. Ct. 1112; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2173
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Alan McSurely v. John L. McClellan Thomas Ratliff, Individually and as Sometime Commonwealth Attorney for Pike County, Kentucky (D.C. Cir. 1982)
- McSURELY v. RATLIFF (6th Cir. 1968)
- McSurely v. Ratliff (6th Cir. 1968)
- Alan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John K. McClellan Thomas Ratliff, Individually and as Sometime Commonwealth Attorney for Pike County Kentucky (D.C. Cir. 1985)
- Sovereign News Co. v. Falke (District Court, N.D. Ohio 1977)
- Alan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John J. McClellan (D.C. Cir. 1976)
- Board of Education v. Department of Health, Education (District Court, S.D. Ohio 1975)
- Barancik v. Investors Funding Corporation Of New York (7th Cir. 1973)
- Barancik v. Investors Funding Corp. of New York (7th Cir. 1973)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The stay heretofore granted, post, p. 914, is continued for 30 days in order to afford the appellants an opportunity to apply to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for a stay. If such timely application is made, the stay entered by this Court shall remain in effect until the Court of Appeals acts on that application.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.