Supreme Court of the United States, 1968

McSurely v. Ratliff

McSurely v. Ratliff
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 18, 1968 · Black, Douglas
390 U.S. 412; 19 L. Ed. 2d 1272; 88 S. Ct. 1112; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2173 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Dan Jack Combs, Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler and Morton Stavis for appellants., Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.

McSurely v. Ratliff

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The stay heretofore granted, post, p. 914, is continued for 30 days in order to afford the appellants an opportunity to apply to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for a stay. If such timely application is made, the stay entered by this Court shall remain in effect until the Court of Appeals acts on that application.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.