Supreme Court of the United States, 1968

BRANIGIN Et Al. v. DUDDLESTON Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 14, 1968 · Harlan, Grills, Court'S

391 U.S. 364; 88 S. Ct. 1666; 20 L. Ed. 2d 641; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1646 (United States Reports)

Counsel

John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Charles S. White for appellants in No. 1252. Marshall F. Kiser for appellant in No. 1263., Leslie Duvall and William H. Sparrenberger for appel-lees in both cases.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Brady v. New Jersey Redistricting Commission (N.J. 1992)
Skolnick v. Board Of Commissioners Of Cook County (7th Cir. 1970)
Skolnick v. Board of Commissioners (7th Cir. 1970)
Smith v. Clark (District Court, S.D. Mississippi 2002)
Mallory v. State of Ohio (District Court, S.D. Ohio 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U. S. 932, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court’s judgment, also acquiesces in the Court’s affirmance of that judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.