Supreme Court of the United States, 1968

Serio v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 10, 1968 · Black, Harlan, Marshall, White, White's

392 U.S. 305; 88 S. Ct. 2063; 20 L. Ed. 2d 1111; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1366 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Paul C. Summitt for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Thomas (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
United States v. Sims (District Court, W.D. Tennessee 1968)
John A. Hutter Et Ux. v. Bernard J. Korzen, Etc (Supreme Court of the United States 1972)
United States v. Grindstaff (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1978)
United States v. Stanley Aaron Headrick (6th Cir. 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968). Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.