Supreme Court of the United States, 1968

Schneble v. Florida

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 10, 1968 · Harlan, White, White's

392 U.S. 298 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. Georgieff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Schneble v. Florida (Supreme Court of the United States 1972)
United States v. Donald E. Belle. Appeal of Donald Belle (3d Cir. 1979)
People v. Thomas (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.