Supreme Court of the United States, 1968

McCarty v. Kansas

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 10, 1968 · Harlan, White, White's

392 U.S. 308; 88 S. Ct. 2065; 20 L. Ed. 2d 1115; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1369 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and /. Richard Foth, Richard E. Oxandale, and Daniel D. Metz, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Thomas (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
State v. Sullivan & Sullivan (Kan. 1978)
State v. Boyd (Kan. 1971)
State v. Pierson (Kan. 1968)
People v. Hayhurst (Colo. 1977)
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (Supreme Court of the United States 1973)
State v. Boyle (Kan. 1971)
State v. Schultz (Kan. 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted with respect to petitioner Boyd. The judgment of the Kansas Supreme Court is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293. The petition for a writ of certiorari with respect to petitioner McCarty is denied.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.