Supreme Court of the United States, 1968

Robert-Arthur Management Corp. v. Tennessee Ex Rel. Canale

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 15, 1968 · Harlan

389 U.S. 578; 88 S. Ct. 691; 19 L. Ed. 2d 777; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2732 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Longstreet Heiskell for appellant., George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

26 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

State v. Hoyt (Minn. 1970)
Vernon Walker Huffman v. United States, Dennis Eugene Pryba v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1972)
United States v. William Groner, D/B/A Lucky Distributors (5th Cir. 1972)
People v. Bloss (Mich. 1972)
Grand Rapids City Attorney v. Bloss (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
People v. Billingsley (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
State v. Marshall (Tenn. 1993)
State v. Lebewitz (Minn. 1972)
Commonwealth v. LaLONDE (Pa. 1972)
Stroud v. State (Ind. 1971)
State v. Carlson (Minn. 1972)
State v. Lebewitz (Minn. 1972)
United States v. New Orleans Book Mart, Inc. (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1971)
In re Seven Magazines (R.I. 1970)
Hayse v. Van Hoomissen (District Court, D. Oregon 1970)
In re Seven Magazines (R.I. 1970)
United States v. Robert Baranov, United States of America v. Harvey B. Levitt, United States of America v. H. B. Levitt & Associates, Inc. (9th Cir. 1969)
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton (Supreme Court of the United States 1973)
State v. Hoelscher (Minn. 1972)
State v. Katz (Superior Court of Delaware 1971)
Duggan v. Guild Theatre, Inc. (Pa. 1969)
Abrams & Parisi, Inc. v. Canale (District Court, W.D. Tennessee 1969)
People v. Mature Enterprises, Inc. (Criminal Court of the City of New York 1973)
Price v. Commonwealth (Va. 1972)
State Ex Rel. Sensenbrenner v. Adult Book Store (Ohio Ct. App. 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Tennessee is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.

The Chief Justice would affirm. Mr. Justice Harlan

would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.