Bertera's Hopewell Foodland, Inc. v. Masters
Bertera's Hopewell Foodland, Inc. v. Masters
390 U.S. 597; 20 L. Ed. 2d 158; 88 S. Ct. 1261; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2004
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
61 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- City of Warwick v. Almac's, Inc. (R.I. 1982)
- Moriarty v. Bradt (N.J. 2003)
- Lundman v. McKown (Minn. Ct. App. 1995)
- McKenzie v. Doctors' Hospital of Hollywood, Inc. (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1991)
- O.G., P.G. v. Baum (Tex. App. 1990)
- In re the Guardianship of Grant (Wash. 1988)
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Harmon (Mo. 1988)
- Baksalary v. Smith (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1984)
- In re the Appeal in Cochise County Juvenile Action No. 5666-J (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981)
- Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation v. Washington (District Court, E.D. Washington 1978)
- Kroger Co. v. O'Hara Township (Pa. Super. Ct. 1976)
- Poe v. Werner (District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania 1974)
- David Pickup v. Edmund Brown, Jr. (9th Cir. 2013)
- In re Guardianship of S.H. (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
- Pickup v. Brown (9th Cir. 2013)
- In re DC (N.J. 2010)
- In re D.C. (N.J. 2010)
- Fawzy v. Fawzy (N.J. 2009)
- Daniel Schleifer v. City Of Charlottesville (4th Cir. 1998)
- Schleifer Ex Rel. Schleifer v. City of Charlottesville (4th Cir. 1998)
- Midtown Hospital v. Miller (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 1997)
- Bucur v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (7th Cir. 1997)
- Mark Hofkin v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company (3d Cir. 1996)
- Walker v. Johnson (District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania 1995)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
BERTERA'S HOPEWELL FOODLAND, INC.
v.
MASTERS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Hubert I. Teitelbaum and Martin M. Sheinman for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.