Stone v. United States
Cases that cite this one
53 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- United States v. Louis M. Darensbourg (5th Cir. 1975)
- United States v. $6,500 in United States Currency (United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas 1984)
- United States v. William H. Hockridge, Charles Petri and Stephen K. Easton (2d Cir. 1978)
- State v. Edwards (Conn. 1972)
- United States v. Erlenbaugh (7th Cir. 1971)
- United States v. Armiento (District Court, S.D. New York 1970)
- William Condon Graham v. United States (6th Cir. 1969)
- Pizzarello v. United States (2d Cir. 1969)
- Pizzarello v. United States (2d Cir. 1969)
- United States v. Leon J. Lewis (2d Cir. 1968)
- Pizzarello v. United States (District Court, S.D. New York 1968)
- United States v. One 1965 Ford Station Wagon (United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia 1968)
- United States v. Mose Holland (2d Cir. 1985)
- United States v. One Assortment of 25 Firearms (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 1980)
- United States v. W. Baldwin Droms (2d Cir. 1977)
- Richard Gordon Bannister v. United States (3d Cir. 1971)
- United States v. Jackson (District Court, N.D. New York 2010)
- State v. Ramirez (Neb. 2008)
- United States v. Parker (District Court, W.D. New York 2001)
- Belton v. United States (D.C. 1994)
- State v. Washington (La. Ct. App. 1991)
- United States v. Francis Olinger (7th Cir. 1985)
- United States v. Patrick C. Remigio, A/K/A Joe Cuervo (10th Cir. 1985)
- United States v. Edwin R. Salovitz (2d Cir. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
STONE
v.
UNITED STATES.
Supreme Court of United States.
Charles W. Tessmer and Emmett Colvin, Jr., for petitioner in No. 9. William T. Griffin for petitioners in No. 14. Seymour Samuels, Jr., and William R. Willis, Jr., for petitioner in No. 77. Anna R. Lavin and Richard E. Gorman for petitioner in No. 798. James G. Starkey for petitioner in No. 1024.
Former Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in No. 9. Former Solicitor General Marshall, *205 Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States in No. 14. Former Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Miss Rosenberg and Mervyn Hamburg for the United States in No. 77. Former Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Miss Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States in No. 121. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Miss Rosenberg for the United States in No. 798. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States in No. 1024.
PER CURIAM.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments of the courts below are vacated and the cases are remanded for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39, and Grosso v. United States, ante, p. 62.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of Nos. 9, 14, 77, and 121.
NOTES
[*] Together with No. 14, Conti et al. v. United States; No. 77, Ross v. United States; No. 121, Donlon v. United States; No. 798, Angelini v. United States; and No. 1024, Pizzarello v. United States, all on petitions for writs of certiorari. No. 77 is to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Nos. 14 and 1024 to the Second Circuit, No. 121 to the Third Circuit, and No. 798 to the Seventh Circuit.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.