Supreme Court of the United States, 1968

Carrillo v. Craven

Carrillo v. Craven
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 17, 1968
392 U.S. 644; 88 S. Ct. 2298; 20 L. Ed. 2d 1354; 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1152 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edsel W. Haws and John Fourt, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.

Carrillo v. Craven

Cases that cite this one

15 later published cases cite this decision. The 14 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U. S. 54.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.