Supreme Court of the United States, 1968

Puentes v. Board of Education

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 17, 1968 · Are, Black, Harlan, Noted, Set, Should, That

392 U.S. 653 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Ernest Fleischman for appellant., Leo F. McGinity for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Whitcomb v. Nebraska State Education Association (Neb. 1969)
Tepedino v. Dumpson (N.Y. 1969)
Puentes v. Board of Ed. of Union Free School Dist. No. 21 (Supreme Court of the United States 1968)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New York for further consideration in light of Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U. S. 563.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.