Supreme Court of the United States, 1969

Stamler v. Willis

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 13, 1969 · Marshall

393 U.S. 217 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Albert E. Jenner, Jr., Thomas P. Sullivan, and Arthur Kinoy for appellants in No. 478. Mr. Jenner for appellant in No. 479., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Maroney, and Lee B. Anderson for appellees in both eases., Briefs of amici curiae were filed by Jack G. Day and Melvin L. Wulf for the American Civil Liberties Union, and by Vern Countryman, Robert F. Drinan, Clark Byse, David F. Cavers, George T. Frampton, and Ira M. Hey-man for certain law school deans and professors.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Powell v. McCormack (Supreme Court of the United States 1969)
Jeremiah Stamler, M.D. And Yolanda F. Hall, and Milton M. Cohen, Intervening v. Hon. Edwin E. Willis (7th Cir. 1969)
Rosa v. Gil (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 1969)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the cases on the merits and that the cases should be set for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.