Wilson v. Kelley
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Willie ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ralph McDOUGAL, Sheriff, Parish of St. Bernard, State of Louisiana, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees (5th Cir. 1983)
- Moncravie v. Dennis (United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas 1981)
- Doss v. Long (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 1981)
- Allen I. Lamar, Allen I. Lamar v. Clyde Whiteside (5th Cir. 1979)
- Mays v. Scranton City Police Department (District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania 1979)
- Dunn v. Jenkins (Ind. 1978)
- United States Ex Rel. Hoss v. Cuyler (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1978)
- In re the Gap Stores Securities Litigation (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1978)
- United States v. Trucking Employers, Inc. (District Court, District of Columbia 1977)
- Thompson v. Board of Education of Romeo Community Schools (District Court, W.D. Michigan 1976)
- Padgett v. Stein (District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania 1975)
- Barrett v. United States Civil Service Commission (District Court, District of Columbia 1975)
- James v. Wallace (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 1974)
- James McLamore v. South Carolina (Supreme Court of the United States 1972)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
WILSON ET AL.
v.
KELLEY, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Howard Moore, Jr., P. Walter Jones, Arthur Kinoy, Melvin L. Wulf, and Martin Garbus for appellants.
Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion O. Gordon, Mathew Robins, and W. Wheeler Bryan, Assistant Attorneys General, and Don L. Hartman, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.